headerpos: 9509
 
 
  Trames
A Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences

ISSN 1736-7514 (electronic)  ISSN 1406-0922 (print)
Published since 1997

Trames
A Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences

ISSN 1736-7514 (electronic)  ISSN 1406-0922 (print)
Published since 1997

Publisher
Information
» Policy statement
» Editorial board
» Editorial programme
Article Publication Charges
Style sheet
Subscription Information
Support and Contact
List of Issues
» 2019
» 2018
» 2017
Vol. 21, Issue 4
Vol. 21, Issue 3
Vol. 21, Issue 2
Vol. 21, Issue 1
» 2016
» 2015
» 2014
» 2013
» 2012
» 2011
» 2010
» 2009
» 2008
» Back Issues
» Back issues (full texts)
  in Google
Publisher
» Other journals
» Staff

PROTECTION OF DISSENTING SHAREHOLDERS IN THE EU CROSS-BORDER MERGERS FRAMEWORK: A CALL FOR FURTHER HARMONIZATION? pp. 215–232

(Full article in PDF format) https://doi.org/10.3176/tr.2017.3.02


Authors

Hamed Alavi, Tatsiana Khamichonak

Abstract

The European cross-border mergers framework is the most comprehensive to date – transnational mergers are possible following the Sevic case and the freedom of establishment, under a SE structure, and via a transfer of seat, whereas the Cross-Border Mergers Directive has been an overall success in harmonizing the rules on cross-border mergers in the EU. Nonetheless, gaps remain, such as creditor and minority shareholder protection. Dissenting shareholders protection is not harmonized on the European level - implementation of protection mechanisms is at the discretion of the Member States. As a result, certain Member States have decided not to transpose the respective provision in the Cross-Border Mergers Directive in national laws and provide for no special remedies for shareholders in cross-border mergers. The question that arises is whether without further harmonization of protection mechanisms the cross-border merger transaction is rendered dysfunctional.

Keywords

minority shareholders, dissenting shareholders, shareholder voting, cross-border merger, Cross-Border Merger Directive, protection of dissenting minority shareholders

References

Biermeyer , T. (2013) Study on the application of the cross-border mergers directive. The European Union. Bech-Bruun , and Lexicdale Available online at <http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/ company/docs/mergers/13 HYPERLINK "http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/company/docs/mergers/131007_study-cross-border-merger-directive_en.pdf"1 HYPERLINK "http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/company/docs/mergers/131007_study-cross-border-merger-directive_en.pdf"007_study-cross-border-merger-directive_en.pdf>. Accessed on 29.04.2016.

C-101/08 Audiolux [2009] ECR I-09823.

Cahn , A. and D. C. Donald (2010) Comparative company law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511779909

Council of Bars and Law Societies of Europe (CCBE) , Response to European Commission consultation of cross-border mergers and divisions , 22.02.2015 , p. 1. Available online at <http://www.ccbe.eu/fileadmin/user_upload/NTCdocument/22022015_EN_CCBE_Con1_
1424700904.pdf>. Accessed on 29.04.2016.

DePamphilis , D. (2011) Mergers and acquisitions basics. Burlington: Elsevier Inc.

Directive 2007/36/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 July 2007 on the exercise of certain rights of shareholders in listed companies. OJ L 184 , 14.07.2007.

Directive 2012/30/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on coordination of safeguards which , for the protection of the interests of members and others , are required by Member States of companies within the meaning of the second paragraph of Article 54 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union , in respect of the formation of public limited liability companies and the maintenance and alteration of their capital , with a view to making such safeguards equivalent. (Recast). OJ L 315 , 14.11.2012.

Donald , D. C. Shareholder Voice and Its Opponents. Institute for Law and Finance , Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universitaet , Working Paper Series No. 40 , 06/2005. Available online at <http://www.ilf-frankfurt.de/fileadmin/_migrated/content_uploads/ILF_WP_040 HYPERLINK "http://www.ilf-frankfurt.de/fileadmin/_migrated/content_uploads/ILF_WP_ 040.pdf".pdf>. Accessed on 29.04.2016.

Estonian Commercial Code (Äriseadustik) §433 (1) (2). This provision is consistent with Article 10(3) of the Cross-Border Mergers Directive.

European Commission Press Release , Daily News 08.09.2014.

Laprade , F. M. (2012) Study on the rights and obligations of shareholders. European Parliament’s Committee on Legal Affairs. Available online at <http://www.europarl.europa HYPERLINK "http://www.europarl.europa.eu/meetdocs/2009_2014/documents/juri/dv/pe462463_/ pe462463_en.pdf".eu/meetdocs/2009_2014/documents/juri/dv/pe462463_/pe462463_ en.pdf>. Accessed on 29.04.2016.

Mäntysaari , P. (2010) The law of corporate finance: general principles and EU law. Heidelberg: Springer.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02750-5
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03055-0
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03058-1

Moeller , S. and C. Brady (2007) Intelligent M&A. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Moll , D. K. (2005) “Minority oppression & the limited liability company: learning (or not) from close corporation history”. Wake Forest Law Review. Public Law and Legal Theory Series 2006-A-0140 , 896. Available online at <http://ssrn.com/abstract=869310>. Accessed on 09.03.2016.

Perakis , E. ed. (2004) Rights of minority shareholders. (General report for the XVI Congress of the International Academy of Comparative Law.) Brussels: Bruylant.

Rusu , C. S. (2006) “A few basic considerations on the importance of cross-border mergers and acquisitions issue within the European context”. Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai Jurisprudentia 1 , 3–15.

Smith , A. (1776) An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. Edinburgh: Printed at the University Press for T. Nelson and P. Brown.
https://doi.org/10.1093/oseo/instance.00043218

Summary of responses to the public consultation on cross border mergers and divisions. European Commission , October 2015. Questions 7–8. Available online at <http://ec.europa.eu/ internal_market/consultations/2014/cross-border-mergers-divisions/docs/summary-of-responses_en.pdf>. Accessed on 29.04.2016.

Van der Elst , C. (2012) “Shareholder rights and shareholder activism: the role of the general meeting of shareholders”. Belgrade Law Review 60 , 3 , 39–64.
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2017691

Van Gerven , D. (2010) Cross-border mergers in Europe. Vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511676215

Van Gerven , D. (2011) Cross-border mergers in Europe. Vol. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139014991

Ventoruzzo , M. (2007). Cross-border mergers , change of applicable Corporate Laws and protection of dissenting shareholders: Withdrawal rights under Italian Law. European Company and Financial Law Review4(1) , 47–75.
https://doi.org/10.1515/ECFR.2007.006

Wearing , R. (2005) Cases in corporate governance. London: SAGE Publications.
https://doi.org/10.18352/ulr.60

Wyckaert , M. (2008). Cross border merger and minority protection: an open-ended harmonisa­tion. Utrecht Law Review4(1) , 40–52.

 
Back

Current Issue: Vol. 23, Issue 3, 2019




Publishing schedule:
No. 1: 20 March
No. 2: 20 June
No. 3: 20 September
No. 4: 20 December