headerpos: 9509
 
 
  Trames
A Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences

ISSN 1736-7514 (electronic)  ISSN 1406-0922 (print)
Published since 1997

Trames
A Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences

ISSN 1736-7514 (electronic)  ISSN 1406-0922 (print)
Published since 1997

Publisher
Information
» Policy statement
» Editorial board
» Editorial programme
Article Publication Charges
Style sheet
Subscription Information
Support and Contact
List of Issues
» 2019
» 2018
» 2017
» 2016
» 2015
Vol. 19, Issue 4
Vol. 19, Issue 3
Vol. 19, Issue 2
Vol. 19, Issue 1
» 2014
» 2013
» 2012
» 2011
» 2010
» 2009
» 2008
» Back Issues
» Back issues (full texts)
  in Google
Publisher
» Other journals
» Staff

CHANGES IN LANGUAGE POLICY IN ESTONIA: SELF-DESCRIPTIONS OF RUSSIAN-SPEAKING STUDENTS; pp. 221–247

(Full article in PDF format) DOI: 10.3176/tr.2015.3.02


Authors

MAIE SOLL, SANDER SALVET, ANU MASSO

Abstract

This study concentrates on one of the most drastic changes in Estonian language policy since the country regained its independence – the change in the language of instruc­tion in Russian-medium schools. The Estonian example is rather unique internationally since the minority group can choose different languages of instruction for schooling. We focus on students’ ethno-cultural self-descriptions as one indicator for studying the change in the language of instruction. We use the online interview method as an empirical basis; the sample consists of graduates from upper-secondary schools/classes with various languages of instruction (Estonian, Russian, language immersion) situated in various regions of Estonia (monolingual vs bilingual everyday setting; n = 14). The results of the analysis reveal the relationships between ethno-cultural self-descriptions and attitudes to the changes in the language of instruction. The ethno-cultural self-descriptions in turn are expressed in terms of general social affiliation (media habits, future plans and affiliation with Estonia). We conclude that the transition to Estonian-language instruction has failed in terms of communication, since a focus on instrumental rather than ethno-cultural issues can lead to the weak social affiliation of individual students.

Keywords

language policy, ethno-cultural self-description, language of instruction, educational change, Russian-speaking population of Estonia, qualitative online interview method

References

Arnold , E. (2004) “Evaluating research and innovation policy: a systems world needs systems evaluations”. Research Evaluation 13 , 1 , 3–17.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3152/147154404781776509

Arundel , A. and H. Hollanders (2005) “Policy , indicators and targets: measuring the impacts of innovation policies”. European Trend Chart on Innovation , MERIT , December 19th.

Cunningham , P. , D. Robsonand , and E. Neves (2008) “Mapping of innovation support measures”. Pro Inno Europe , Inno Learning Platform.

Edquist , C. (2001) “The systems of innovation approach and innovation policy: an account of the state of the art.” Paper presented at the DRUID 2001 Nelson and Winter conference , Aalborg , Denmark , June 12–15.

Edquist , C. (2002) “Innovation policy – a systemic approach”. In The Globalizing Learning Economy , 219–238. D. Archibugi , B.-Å. Lundvall , eds. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/0199258171.003.0013

Edquist , C. (2006) “System of innovation: perspectives and challenges.” In The Oxford handbook of innovation , 181–208. J. Fagerberg , D. C. Mowery , R. R. Nelson , eds. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199286805.003.0007

Edquist , C. , F. Malerba , J. S. Metcalfe , F. Montobbio , and W. E. Steinmueller (2004) “Sectoral systems: implication for European innovation policy.” In Sectoral systems of innovation: concepts , issues and analyses of six major sectors in Europe , 427–461. F. Malerba , ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511493270.013

European Commission (2003) Third European report on science & technology indicators: towards a knowledge-based economy. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.

Falk , M. (2004) “What drives business R&D intensity across OECD countries?”. WIFO Working Papers 236.

Feinson , S. (2003) “National innovation systems: overview and country cases”. In Knowledge flows and knowledge collectives: understanding the role of science and technology policies in development. Vol. 1: Knowledge flows , innovation , and learning in developing countries. A project for the global inclusion program of the Rockefeller Foundation , 13–38.

Fischer , M. M. (2001) “Innovation , knowledge creation and systems of innovation”. The Annals of Regional Science 35 , 199–216.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s001680000034

Freeman , C. (1987) Technology policy and economic performance: lessons from Japan. London: Pinter.

Friedrich , P. , J. Reiljan , and I. Paltser (2011) “Policy suggestions for integrated public innovation policies in a small country”. In Innovation systems in small catching-up economies: new perspectives on practice and policy , 343–370. E. G. Carayannis , U. Varblane , and T. Roo­laht , eds. New York , Dordrech , Heidelberg , and London: Springer.

Koch , P. , B. Pukl , and A. Wolters (2007) “OMC policy mix review report country report Estonia”. October.

Kuhlmann , S. and E. Arnold (2001) “RCN in the Norwegian research and innovation system”. Background Report No 12 in the Evaluation of the Research Council of Norway.

Lundvall , B.-Å. (2007) “National innovation systems – analytical concept and development tool”. Industry and Innovation 14 , 1 , 95–119.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13662710601130863

Manjón , J. V. G. (2010) “A proposal of indicators and policy framework for innovation benchmark in Europe.” Journal of Technology Management & Innovation 5 , 2 , 13–23.

Metcalfe , J. S. (1994) “Evolutionary economics and technology policy”. The Economic Journal 104 , 425 , 931–944.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2234988

Metcalfe , J. S. (2005) “Systems failure and the case for innovation policy”. In Innovation policy in a knowledge based economy , 47–74. P. Llerena , M. Matt , eds. Berlin: Springer.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/3-540-26452-3_3

Nelson , R. R. (1992) “National innovation systems: a retrospective on a study”. Industrial and Corporate Change 1 , 2 , 347–374.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/icc/1.2.347

OECD (1997) National innovation systems. Paris: OECD Publications.

OECD (1997a) Oslo manual. The measurement of scientific and technological activities: proposed guidelines for collecting and interpreting technological innovation data. 2nd ed. Paris: OECD Publications.

OECD (1999) Managing national systems of innovation. Paris: OECD Publications.

OECD (2005) Governance of innovation systems. Vol. 1: Synthesis report. Paris: OECD Publica­tions.

Reid , A. (2009) “Systems failures and innovation policy: do national policies reflect differentiated challenges in the EU27? Observations from a decade of the European TrendChart on innovation”. Paper presented at the 6 Countries Programme workshop on New economic ground for innovation policy , Bilbao , Spain , September 14.

Reiljan , J. (1981) “Interpretacija rezul’tatov sovremennogo faktornogo analiza v ekonomičeskix issledovanijax”. Učenye zapiski Tartuskogo universiteta 593 , 64–77.

Reiljan , J. (2014) Majandusotsuste analüütiline põhistamine. [Analytical establishing of economic decisions.] Tartu: Tartu University Press.

Soete , L. , B. Verspagen , and B. ter Weel (2009) “Systems of innovation”. UNU-MERIT Working Paper 2009-062.

Tsipouri , L. , A. Reid , and M. Miedzinski (2008) European innovation progress report 2008. Brussels: Directorate-General for Enterprise Policy , European Commission.

 
Back

Current Issue: Vol. 23, Issue 3, 2019




Publishing schedule:
No. 1: 20 March
No. 2: 20 June
No. 3: 20 September
No. 4: 20 December